{"id":43274,"date":"2020-11-27T06:36:36","date_gmt":"2020-11-27T05:36:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/?p=43274"},"modified":"2025-12-10T19:11:58","modified_gmt":"2025-12-10T18:11:58","slug":"the-spooky-ultimate-purpose-of-gender-ideology-explained-by-one-of-its-creators","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2020\/11\/27\/the-spooky-ultimate-purpose-of-gender-ideology-explained-by-one-of-its-creators\/","title":{"rendered":"The spooky ultimate purpose of gender ideology explained by one of its creators"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gender ideology, which emerged from the far-left and is now very widespread in society, is an incessant source of nonsense. But what is its end goal?<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><rel><a href=\"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2019\/03\/20\/gender-ideology-against-biology-this-is-how-they-try-to-demolish-our-democracy\/\">Gender ideology against biology: this is how they try to demolish our democracy<\/a><\/rel><br \/>\n<rel><a href=\"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2018\/01\/09\/simone-de-beauvoir-the-pedophilia-supporter-who-laid-the-foundations-of-gender-ideology\/\">Simone de Beauvoir: the pedophilia supporter who laid the foundations of gender ideology<\/a><\/rel><\/p>\n<p><big>The difference between equity feminism and gender feminism<\/big><\/p>\n<p>In 2008 I already indicated here <a href=\"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2008\/05\/07\/feminismo-equidad-vs-feminismo-genero\/\">the difference between equality feminism and gender feminism<\/a>. The first sought, from a liberal perspective, equal rights and opportunities for women, a highly praiseworthy purpose that has already been achieved in Western countries. However, gender feminism does not have a liberal perspective, but a marxist one. <strong>The first to describe the true nature of gender feminism was the feminist Christina Hoff Sommers<\/strong> in her book \"Who Stole Feminism?\" (1994), in which she coined the term \"gender ideology\" to refer to that marxist feminism. In 2016, in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.elmundo.es\/cronica\/2016\/09\/17\/57d79cb1268e3e94358b4638.html\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">an interview published by the Spanish newspaper El Mundo<\/a>, she defined it like this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><strong>\"It is a hard-line school of feminism that sees women, even in the West, as captives of a system of injustice and oppression.<\/strong> According to this theory, every human achievement actually bears the stamp of patriarchy: literature, philosophy, science, music, or language. It is not enough to change laws or traditions. The entire system has to be dismantled. <strong>Gender feminism emerged from the radical politics of the 1960s and was marked by marxist philosophy<\/strong> and that of Marcuse, Frantz Fanon and Michel Foucault.\"<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><big>What one of the founders of gender feminism wrote<\/big><\/p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2015\/11\/08\/lo-que-pocos-cuentan-el-origen-ideologico-totalitario-del-actual-feminismo-de-genero\/\">my article on the totalitarian origin of gender feminism<\/a>, I exposed some of the writings published in 1970 by<strong> one of its most influential creators and authors: the Canadian communist Shulamith Firestone.<\/strong> We then saw how this radical fanatic openly proposed to destroy \"the biological family\", inspired by the thought of Karl Marx.<\/p>\n<p><big>She believed that communism failed because it did not destroy the family<\/big><\/p>\n<p>However, in her book <a href=\"https:\/\/cominsitu.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/11\/the-dialectic-of-sex_-the-case-for-feminis-shulamith-firestone.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\"The Dialectic of Sex\"<\/a> (1970) Firestone does not stop there. <strong>For her, the destruction of the family is part of something even greater.<\/strong> In the first edition published by Bantam Book, the following can be read on page 212:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><b>\"The failure of the Russian Revolu\u00adtion is directly traceable to the failure of its attempts to eliminate the family and sexual repression.<\/b> This failure, in turn, as we have seen, was caused by the limitations of a male-biased revolutionary analysis based on economic class alone, one that failed to take the family fully into account even in its function as an economic unit. <strong>By the same token, all socialist revolutions to date have been or will be failures for precisely these reasons.<\/strong> Any initial liberation under current socialism must always revert back to repression, because <strong>the family structure is the source of psychological, economic, and political oppression.\"<\/strong> <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That is to say, that the reasons why Firestone wanted to destroy the family not only had a supposed relationship with a purpose to liberate women: <strong>what she really wanted was the triumph of communism destroying the family, which is the most solid social dam versus totalitarian experiments.<\/strong> For her, communism had failed in Russia not because it had been too totalitarian, but because it had reversed its more totalitarian plans.<\/p>\n<p><big>She proposed to abolish childhood and normalize incest and pedophilia<\/big><\/p>\n<p>On page 239 of the book, Firestone <strong>proposes the abolition of the \"concept of childhood\", detaching it from any relationship with their biological parents<\/strong>, and pointed out that <em>\"though children would be fewer, they would not be monopolized, but would mingle freely throughout the society to the benefit of all.\"<\/em><\/p>\n<p>What we come across on page 240 is the consequence that Firestone draws from that totalitarian society: the normalization of pedophilia and incest. Speaking of children, she states: <strong><em>\"if he should choose to relate sexually to adults, even if he should happen to pick his own genetic mother, there would be no a priori reasons for her to reject his sexual advances<\/strong>, because the incest taboo would have lost its function.\"<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On the same page she bluntly repeats her intention to normalize pedophilia (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/2018\/01\/09\/simone-de-beauvoir-the-pedophilia-supporter-who-laid-the-foundations-of-gender-ideology\/\">something that another of the ideologues of gender feminism, Simone de Beauvoir, also defended<\/a>): <em><strong>\"Relations with children would include as much genital sex as the child was capable of<\/strong> \u2014probably considerably more than we now believe\u2014 but because genital sex would no longer be the central focus of the relationship, lack of orgasm would not present a serious problem. <strong>Adult\/child and homosexual sex taboos would disappear.\"<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><big>An ideology that has ended up assuming even the self-conscious right wing<\/big><\/p>\n<p>After reading these aberrations, written by a woman who suffered from schizophrenia for decades, <strong>it is chilling to realize the enormous influence that the gender ideology formulated by Firestone has reached in our society<\/strong>, to the point that it is no longer just a collection of nonsense defended from the far-left, but also by the rest of the political map. <strong>Even the most self-conscious right wing has ended up taking on these nonsense without question<\/strong>, lashing out hard at those of us who still oppose them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>They can no longer say that a group of exaggerated \"far-righters\" are trying to link gender ideology with the promotion of pedophilia and a totalitarian society<\/strong>, since one of the founders of that ideology herself exposed it openly. The question we must ask ourselves now is: <strong>knowing this, are they willing to continue being accomplices of that ideology created to push us towards a totalitarian, communist and pedophile society?<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gender ideology, which emerged from the far-left and is now very widespread in society, is an incessant source of nonsense. But what is its end goal?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[10375],"tags":[2377,10444,10385,10401,14503,14502,9363],"class_list":["post-43274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-history","tag-christina-hoff-sommers","tag-communism","tag-feminism","tag-gender-ideology","tag-incest","tag-pedophilia","tag-shulamith-firestone"],"publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-10-01 14:31:58","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.outono.net\/elentir\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}