One of the most common methods by which some journalists manipulate certain statements is to take them out of context.<\/p>\n
All journalists know that context is important when assessing the meaning of a word<\/strong>, but sometimes this is forgotten in the interest of attacking a person. In the last few hours, a multitude of media outlets have claimed that Trump has said that there will be a \"bloodbath\" if he loses the election<\/strong>, as if he were issuing a threat. Let's look at some examples:<\/p>\n Has Donald Trump really made that threat? To verify this it is necessary to review that speech. Trump uttered that word at a public event in Ohio.<\/strong> You can see the full video here.<\/a> The word in question appears at point 29:56 of the video. He said it in the following sentence: \"If I don't get elected it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole\"<\/em><\/strong>. You can see the video here (I have inserted it so that it plays a little before those words, to review the context):<\/p>\n
\n\n