The ultra-left has been using the paranoid techniques of the Venezuelan dictatorship for years to demonize all its rivals.<\/p>\n
The manifesto is accepting fake signatures without any verification<\/big><\/p>\n Yesterday we saw here the curious signatures of the manifesto of \"journalists\" in support of S\u00e1nchez<\/a>, which includes names of senior officials of the Franco regime and a Nazi criminal<\/strong>. It is evident that the administrators of that manifesto are accepting false signatures. They have even included the names of two opposition politicians: Alberto N\u00fa\u00f1ez Feij\u00f3o<\/strong>, president of the PP, and Santiago Abascal Conde<\/strong>, president of Vox.<\/p>\n The manifesto is administered by a far-left digital media<\/big><\/p>\n But who are those who administer this manifesto and this collection of signatures? At the bottom of the page of the manifesto the following reads: \"This form was created in Revista Contexto S.L.\"<\/strong> So, we already have the answer: Revista Contexto S.L. is the publishing company of the digital newspaper CTXT.es. This Friday, CTXT published a news story stating that more than 10,700 people had already signed the manifesto<\/a> (including, as I have indicated, false signatures that include names of dead people).<\/p>\n The manifesto speaks of an \"attack by the media and judicial extreme right against the wife of the president of the Government<\/strong>\"<\/em>, ensuring that it is \"a new attempt to subvert the will popular expressed at the polls through illicit means.\"<\/em> In its title, the manifesto carries this phrase: \"No to the judicial and media coup.\"<\/strong> It is a way of describing the media that published the news about the activities of Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez and the judge who has opened proceedings on those activities as coup plotters. An accusation already used by the Venezuelan dictatorship against the democrats.<\/strong><\/p>\n It ssks the media \u201cnot to spread lies\u201d while accepting false signatures<\/big><\/p>\n Yesterday, that far-left digital newspaper stated<\/a> that \"pluralism demands that there be media of all tendencies, but that they do not spread lies<\/strong>\"<\/em>, a statement published in an editorial of a media that at the same time is administering a manifesto that includes clearly false endorsements and that are admitted without any type of verification<\/strong>. Can this also be accepted as spreading lies, or if a left-wing media does it, then is it valid?<\/p>\n In 2019 CTXT accused S\u00e1nchez of \u201cleading a soft coup\u201d in Venezuela<\/big><\/p>\n The most striking thing is to observe that this is not the first time that CTXT sees \"coup plotters\" among its ideological rivals<\/strong>. On February 5, 2019, in an editorial, that far-left newspaper harshly criticized Pedro S\u00e1nchez<\/a > for recognizing, as many other countries did, Juan Guaid\u00f3 as interim president of Venezuela, after the repeated electoral fraud of the Maduro regime. CTXT addressed S\u00e1nchez in these terms: \"You should not lead a soft coup<\/strong>, nor grant legitimacy to a United States puppet in a process that no one knows if it will end in a coup military<\/strong>, in civil war or in a Panama or Libya-type invasion.\"<\/em><\/p>\n So, as we can see, those who now call those who investigate the activities of Bego\u00f1a G\u00f3mez \"coup\"<\/strong>, as if the wife of the president of the government were above the law, accused S\u00e1nchez himself of \"leading a soft coup\" in Venezuela five years ago<\/strong> for not recognizing any legitimacy to the dictatorship of Nicol\u00e1s Maduro. They are the ones who now call reporting on the economic activities of S\u00e1nchez's wife \"coup\" and demand that the media \"not spread lies,\" accusing them of \"coup.\" Let's imagine what a Spain would be like in which people like this decided what can and cannot be published in the media.<\/strong><\/p>\n ---<\/p>\n
\n