1. Espectador

   Pues el Newsweek no la pone muy bien:

   Greengrass shows us very well that it was stupid to allow the looting, that de-Baathification and dismantling the Army were bad ideas, and that all of it led to the insurgency. But then he tells us that we still might have accomplished the mission had one man—one rogue, truth-seeking officer—tracked down a little black notebook whisked away by a Saddam loyalist. In other words, Paul Greengrass compresses the complexity so painstakingly assembled by Chandrasekaran into one notebook that contains one secret that reveals the one important source that only one journalist discovered after speaking to one evil administration official. But in the real Iraq, there were many secrets, many heroes, many villains and accomplices (witting and unwitting), and plenty of good and bad journalism.

   Como película de acción puede estar bien. Pero, creo, que simplifica demasiado lo que pasó.
   PS: Aviso, no la he visto, pero Newsweek ha criticado mucho a Bush por la invasión de Iraq, por lo que cualquier crítica a una película anti-Bush (y esta lo es, Matt Damon es un contribuyente demócrata convencido a quien Sarak Palin le parece «una bruja mala de Disney» y le da miedo) o anti-invasión de Iraq, hay que tenerla en cuenta.
   Artículo.

   22:06 | 12/03/10

2. Elentir

   Hay que ver la película hasta el final para darse cuenta de que la cosa no es tan simple…

   22:28 | 12/03/10

Opina sobre esta entrada: