According to certain propaganda, the Left is synonymous with tolerance and love for reason and science. Some even present the ideologies of the left as a form of scientific thought.
Throughout history there have been numerous attempts to censor scientific thought for certain points of view, and not only religious, but also ideological. The recent attempt to censor science by calling it “sexist” is not new. It is not even the first time that the Left tries to censor science because it contradicted their ideological theses. However, few authors dare to delve into this question. Why?
A pseudoscientific theory fueled by ideological prejudices
An exception is Luis del Pino, journalist and Telecommunications Engineer, who in August 2015 published in his blog a very interesting article, with this title: “Communist obscurantism and the persecution of scientists.” In that article he spoke of Lysenkism, a pseudoscientific theory that owes its name to a scientist close to Stalin, Trofim Lysenko, who condemned genetics as a “bourgeois pseudoscience” and “fascist”. And based on what? On the one hand, Darwin’s theory of natural selection clashed with communist ideological egalitarianism. In addition, an atheistic dictatorship like the USSR was reluctant to accept the laws of Mendel’s genetics, because besides being a scientist he was a Catholic religious. It is the same prejudice that many leftists hold today against any Christian scientist, no matter how prestigious he may be.
The censorship of scientific theories and the purges of scientists in the USSR
As Luis del Pino explained in that article, in August 1948 Lysenko managed to get the Academy of Agricultural Sciences to forbid Mendel’s genetic theories and Darwin’s theory of evolution. But his proposals were not limited to censor scientific theories based on ideological premises, as Luis del Pino recalled then: “Three thousand biologists (three thousand!) were dismissed that autumn from their jobs in universities and laboratories for teaching Genetics or Theory of Evolution, beginning with the directors of numerous centers and research groups.” In many cases, reprisals were not exhausted in the loss of the job: hundreds of Soviet scientists were sent to prisons, to the Gulag concentration camps and even to psychiatric hospitals, and others were even executed.
The names of the reprisals would be famous today if they had been condemned by the Church, but as they were victims of a communist dictatorship, in many cases it is not even easy to find information about them. I indicate some of the purged, mainly cited by Dr. Vadim J. Birstein in his book “The perversion of knowledge: the true story of Soviet science”, in the aforementioned article by Luis del Pino and other sources that I quote at the end of this entry (obvious to say that the list was much longer):
The catastrophic result of putting Marxism before biology
In spite of everything seen, the most dramatic consequences of Lysenko’s blunders were not the purges he unleashed, but the approaches he promoted in the agricultural field, by applying marxism to biology. As noted by Thayer Watkins (“The Great Leap Forward period in China, 1958-1960”), Lysenko “said that plants of the same species do not compete with each other but instead help each other to survive. This was linked to the Marxist notion of classes in which members of the same class do not compete but instead help each other survive. So Marxist ideology seemed to support the notion that the denser grain was planted the better it was for the grain. But in reality this close planting led to whithering of the plants after the initial germination phase.“ Watkins points out that “All of the Lysenko nonsense had to accepted in the Soviet Union and promoted in propaganda as scientific truth. The Marxists in China apparently believed it was the truth. The reality was that this nonsense resulted in less production of food.” Unfortunately for many, Lysenko’s cultivation methods were implanted in the USSR and since 1953 also in China, contributing to the terrible famines that killed millions of people in both countries.
From the Far-Left, this pseudo-scientist continues to be defended
In the USSR, it was not until the 1960s, years after Stalin’s death, that Lysenko was ousted. By then, the damage was done. Despite this, some still praise that pseudo-scientist. The Far-Left website Nodo50 contains articles that still defend him; a communist website refers to him as “an exceptional botanist experimenter” and even on the website of the Complutense University of Madrid, a public university, you can read an article in which he presents Lysenko as a victim of a “lynching”, in which read things like this: “The lynching unleashed by imperialism against Lysenko tried to overthrow the only bulwark imposed by science and the materialist dialectic against ethnic and social racism.” Of course, not a word about the purges that Lysenko promoted. All this reaffirms a fact: that communism is indifferent to reality and incapable of recognizing its own mistakes, even when they have caused millions of deaths.
(Photo: Agents of the NKVD, the political police of Stalin, pointing their revolvers)
Do you want Facebook and Twitter to decide for you what you should read on this site? Subscribe for free to the daily blog newsletter:
The mail subscription service to Counting Stars will allow you to receive in your mailbox a daily email with the new posts published in this blog. It is a free service. Once you have entered your email in this box and press the "Click to subscribe" black button, you will receive a confirmation email in your mailbox to activate your subscription. If at any time you want to unsubscribe, you only just have to click the link that you will find at the bottom of each newsletter.