Leftist media has lost its mind: now it tries to make cannibalism fashionable

@ElentirENG ES 7·26·2022 · 7:03 0

The political, media and academic left has spent years promoting every attempt to demolish the pillars of Western culture, in favor of moral relativism.

The left disguises the slitting murder of a newborn girl as an abortion to promote it
Scandal in the USA: the left-wing blocks a law against infanticide in the Senate

The left has been promoting a countercultural discourse in which the West and Christianity are always to blame for all evils and, therefore, everything they mean in our society must be eradicated. They say they want to put concepts such as progress, diversity and tolerance in their place, but the reality is very different. The left fits the discrepancy and disparity of opinions very badly, it labels everything as "hate" what he doesn't like and seems to have an insane propensity to identify as "progress" any barbarity, however crazy it may be, with the only condition that it contradicts Christian values.

The New York Times and its article whitewashing cannibalism

For now, the latest episode in this process of subversion of the moral foundations of the West came last Saturday. The New York Times (NYT), one of the world leaders in media progressivism, published an amazing article whitewashing cannibalism. The message in which the NYT announced that news has caused a scandal on Twitter. And it is not for minor. Note the text: "Cannibalism has a time and a place. Some recent books, films and shows suggest that the time is now. Can you stomach it?" Below these lines you can see the tweet in question, which has received an avalanche of criticism and scathing comments.

One of the most accurate comments on this NYT nonsense has been written by the conservative journalist Jon Gabriel: "Post-Christian culture seems a lot like pre-Christian culture."

Interestingly, in 2020 the NYT published an article titled: "What if the meat we ate was human?" The article included criticism of the consumption of animal meat and capitalism. It seems that the NYT has gone from using cannibalism as a claim against the consumption of animal meat, to proposing it as an alternative. Perhaps in the environmental circles of the left someone has had the "brilliant" idea of that this is the best way to end humanity (which they see as a threatening parasite for the environment). The "final solution" of the left for its ecological catastrophism would no longer be abortion or euthanasia, but that we eat each other.

For the ecological catastrophism towards cannibalism

It must be said that this is not the first time that the left has tried to make cannibalism fashionable. The American entomologist Paul R. Ehrlich, one of the best-known promoters of the myth of overpopulation and ecological catastrophism (his 1968 book "The Population Bomb" is the bible of neo-Malthusianism) proposed in 2014 cannibalism as a way to avoid overpopulation. It is not the only barbarity that this man has supported. Let us remember that supported prohibiting women from having as many children as they want. Likewise, he has proposed abortion as a remedy against unemployment and as a measure to protect the environment.

Very influenced by Ehrlich's work, in 1973 the film "Soylent Green" (translated in Spain as "When fate reaches us") was released, a dystopian work about a future marked by overpopulation, hunger and ecological disaster, in which human corpses were used to produce food, Soylent Green, with which to feed the population, but without revealing its origin. That film showed cannibalism as a horror, but one wonders if some are not already considering it as a solution to a problem that doesn't even exist or that, in any case, could come to exist because of the environmental fanaticism and its determination that we give up consuming animal meat.

In 2021 El País spoke about the food efficiency of cannibalism

In Spain, the socialist newspaper El País published in 2021 a delirious news story about the Armie Hammer case, in which statements could be read such as these: "Cannibalism has always fascinated the human mind, taking it to dark and slippery lands. (...) The desire to ingest other people's parts has had a strong presence in popular culture. (...) In Spain there is evidence of cannibalism in sites such as the Gran Dolina, in Atapuerca, related to Homo antecessor, some 800,000 years old. According to some research, it was the most efficient way to feed.".

A way to test how manipulable we are?

At this point, it would be good to start asking yourself: how many of the aberrations proposed by the left respond to its propensity to go against Christianity in everything, and how many respond to possible disorders of the most influential figures in that part of the political map? This, of course, without excluding the possibility that some ideologues on the left are testing the moral elasticity of our society and its ability to accept any barbarity, no matter how crazy, thus measuring our ability to be manipulated: the classic Overton window.

---

Image: frame from the film "The Silence of the Lambs" (1991).